Employees in the cadre of
Maximum lodging charges that can be reimbursed (Taxes extra)
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Vide our letter to the ED (Personnel) dated
we had demanded increase in lodging charges at hotels during official
tour. The relevant portion of the letter is reproduced below:
We thank the management for accepting our demand.
"We would like to bring to your kind notice regarding the following issues, where we feel that a substantial revision is overdue:-
1. Revision in limit of re-imbursement of lodging charges at hotels to employees on official tour: - This limit was last revised on
1st December 2008. Thus, a period of almost 4 years has
Thereafter, we made regular follow-up for it.
We are pleased to announce that LIC management accepted our above demand and has revised lodging charges at hotels on official tour w.e.f. 01.01.2013 vide their Circular No: CO/PER/ER-A/016/2012 dated
The revised rates are as follow:
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Monday, December 24, 2012
16th Extended EC meeting of NOINO was held at Dehradun on 5th &
November 2012. Besides NOINO office-bearers - Shri Prakash
Javadekar, MP(Rajya Sabha); Shri Uday Patwardhan, Financial Sector
I/c, BMS; Shri T.Adhikari, Sr DM, LICI Dehradun Division; and Shri Pawan
Kumar, Organizing Secretary, BMS also attended and addressed the meeting.
Video-clips of the meeting are available at:
UNIT OF CLASS I
FEDERATION AFFILIATES WITH NOINO SURAT
· 135 OFFICERS JOIN NOINO FOLD
NOINO has conquered one more frontier. This time it is
division in Western Zone. NOINO has been successful in hoisting the BMS flag for the first time
in Surat division. Surat
For those who have been observing & following NOINO’s activities, this should not come as a surprise. Such successes have been achieved purely on the basis of NOINO’s diligence, dedication & doggedness in pursuing the issues of the Class I Officers.
In a simple affair, the
unit of Class I Federation affiliated itself with
NOINO on Surat Sunday, 23rd December
2012 in a Special
General Meeting called specially for this purpose. Smt. Anagha Sant, GS, NOINO; Shri Ganesh
Kamath, Chief Advisor, NOINO; Shri Dattaraj
Prabhukhanolkar, Resident Secretary, NOINO; Shri Vishwas Shastri, GS, NOINO WZ unit; Shri Anil Bhagdikar, President, NOINO WZ unit; Shri Amit Vaidya, VP, NOINO, WZ unit; Shri Ram Vadalkar, GS, NOINO Vadodara unit were present on this
occasion. The SDM of Surat, Shri Girish
Kumar was also present on this occasion. More than 100 officers attended
The historic special general meeting started with a resolution announcing the decision to affiliate the
unit of Class I Federation to NOINO. The resolution
was passed unanimously amidst thunderous applause. Shri Malcolm Bhathena, GS of Class I Federation Surat unit explained why
it was felt necessary to affiliate the unit with NOINO. He said that the entire
officers’ community in Surat
was impressed by the activities & achievements of NOINO. Shri Bharatbhai Parameshwarwala, President
of Class I Federation Surat
unit also spoke on the occasion. He informed that 135 officers had already paid
their subscription. In addition to these, many officers also paid their
subscription on the spot. Surat
Many officers also spoke their minds. Most of them said that the Class I Officers in
were reeling under intense bulldozing tactics &
humiliation by the divisional management. Surat
Speaking on this occasion, Shri Vishwas Shastri, GS, NOINO, WZ unit spoke about the achievements of NOINO. He said that the WZ unit would be always with the officers of
& take care of their problems at all levels. Surat
The Senior Divisional Manager, Shri Girish Kumar, said that the customer of LIC was our GOD & it was our sacred duty to serve him / her at any cost. He wished the newly elected
team of NOINO all success. Surat
Our ex-Zonal President Shri Vilas Purkar also spoke on this occasion. He said that BMS always believed in the slogan “Desh ke hith mein karenge kaam, kaam ke lenge poore daam” & said that all BMS activists always made a conscious effort to contribute towards the prosperity of the industry.
The GS of NOINO Smt Anagha Sant guided the assembly. She said that the officers should have self-belief since it was mainly because of their hard work that the Corporation had reached such heights & also because they were selected as officers due to their meritorious works. She also appealed the lady officers to come forward & play more important role in the union activities.
Shri Ganesh Kamath, Chief Advisor, NOINO gave the concluding speech. He congratulated the assembly for taking a historic decision of affiliating with NOINO. He said that according to Swami Vivekanand, fear was the greatest drawback of a human being & once this fear was overcome, it was possible to conquer everything. He said that the Central leadership of NOINO including our President Shri Prakash Javadekar was keeping a close watch on all divisions of LIC & insults of any Class I Officer would not be tolerated. He assured the officers of
that NOINO would take up all matters pertaining to Surat with the Zonal & Central management. Surat
The vote of thanks was given by Shri Bharatbhai Parmeshwarwala.
The following divisional committee was unanimously elected:-
1. Sri. Bharat .M. Parmeshwarwala – President
2. Sri. B.C. Chaudhari – Vice President
3. Sri. M.S.Bhathena – Divisional Secretary
4. Sri. K.S.Rana – Organizing Secretary
5. Sri.H.V.Passwala – Joint Secretary
6. Sri.R.C.Gohil – Joint Secretary
7. Sri.K.Z.Patel. – Treasurer
8. Sri.C.C.Patel - EC Member
9. Sri.N.K.Barot- EC Member
10. Sri. P.L.Gajjarkar – EC Member
11. Sri. P.R.Soni - EC Member
12. Sri. G.D. Vesuna - EC Member
13. Sri. V.D. Gupta - EC Member
14. Sri. D.K. Kadva - EC Member
15. Sri. Naresh .K. Kantharia - EC Member
16. Sri. J.U.Khengar - EC Member
17. Smt. I.N. Agharkar - EC Member
18. Smt. H.D.Parikh - EC Member19.Sri. D.M.Maru - EC Member
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
The frustration of Class I Officers is increasing day by day. The Class I Officers, particularly in the branches are over-burdened by the work-load. They are selectively being targeted. Many issues remain un-resolved. Consider this:-
- AO Batches of 2005 & 2006 and ADM Batch of 2008 not considered for promotion.
- Wage-revision has become due on
1st August 2012. Management has not invited for discussions.
- No progress on the issue of One more option for pension.
- No recruitment in Class III & Cashiers. The burden of the same has to be borne by Class I Officers.
- In some divisions, Class I Officers are being selectively targeted on the issue of Excess & Wrong payments & are being pressurized to pay the amount.
- Compulsion of Property returns/DOPA/P-form.
- Subsidy in Mediclaim for Class I Officers is 2/3rd of the premium. For all others (including retired employees) the subsidy is 3/4th of the premium.
- In many places, Class I Officers don’t have adequate space to sit.
NOINO has decided to stand up & protest this injustice being meted out to Class I Officers. We would be conducting protest demonstrations on the above issues at Yogakshem as well as at all other Zonal offices on
December 2012 during lunch-hours. We
appeal you to join the demonstrations in large numbers.
A NOINO delegation consisting of our newly elected General Secretary Smt. Anagha Sant; Shri Ganesh Kamath, Chief Advisor; Shri Sanjay Ramdasi, Jt. Treasurer; Shri Dattaraj Prabhukhanolkar, Resident Secretary, NOINO; Shri Manish Patankar, Jt Secy, NOINO WZ unit, met the Executive Director (P) Shri M R Kumar and Shri T R Mendiratta, Chief (Personnel) on 14th December 2012. The following issues were discussed:-
A) Batches for Promotion: In the ensuing promotion round of 2013, the AO batches of 2005 & 2006 & the ADM batch of 2008 have not been considered for promotion by the management. We strongly protested this fact & demanded that these batches should be considered. We submitted that by this decision, the officers are frustrated, demoralized & there is a lot of unrest among them. We presented our analysis of the statistics & argued that it was possible to consider these batches. ED (P) said that he would examine the statistics presented by us. However, he did not sound positive on this issue. We have suggested a few solutions. The primary solution was to increase vacancies. Just as AAO & AO cadres are considered inter-changeable, ADM & DM could also be considered inter-changeable & more officers can be accommodated. We also suggested that just as an AO is posted in a branch where BM is posted, similarly, ADM could be posted where SBM is posted. Splitting of portfolios can also be a solution. We also suggested that the current procedure of promotion should give way to the procedure of ‘promotion by application’. By this way, only those who are interested in promotion in the particular year would be considered & to that extent the competition would be reduced. On this particular issue (of ‘promotion by application’), ED(P) sounded positive. However, he said that the management would consider the implementation of this suggestion next year. We have also suggested long-term solutions (already demanded in our charter) like running scales & granting grades & benefits for eligible officers missing promotion for want of vacancies. NOINO will decide the future course of action in this matter shortly.
B) One more Pension Option:- We have once again reiterated our demand for this and stressed(once again) that this should not be linked with our wage revision. ED(P) sounded positive on this issue & said that management would be following up the issue with Finance Ministry.
C) Fixing of Responsibility for Excess/Wrong Payments:- We pointed out that in some Divisions only Officers are held responsible and are pressurized to pay the amount. We have already raised this issue with the MD Shri Sushobhan Sarker on
11th October 2012. We have offered some solutions like “Fidelity Insurance” and creating a “Reserve Fund” to cover the “Excess/Wrong Payments”. We said that
after shifting our dependence to the computerized system, it is illogical to
fix the responsibility, except for gross negligence or intentional mistakes.
The incidence of such cases (the proportion of excess/wrong payments to total
payments) is very low. The Outstanding amount is only about 40 crores. Out of
this only about 40% was outstanding from policyholders. Due to shortage of
staff, it is not possible to adhere to the usual procedure of one employee each
for preparing, checking & passing the voucher. Resultantly, only two
instead of three employees do the job. Thus, the risk increases, so also the amount
of recovery from each employee. It is also not possible to check 100% payments
while adhering to the customers’ demand and our cut off dates. On one hand, we
expect the employees to meet the dead-lines of Claims settlement as well as
maintain ‘NIL’ ratio & on the other hand we expect that no errors should be
committed & manual calculations should be done. It is also expected that
while settling claims, even premium should be calculated. This is practically
impossible. We asked a simple question. If the Data Vigilance Module can detect
errors, then why care has not been taken to incorporate steps in the
programming so that errors do not occur at all? ED(P) was very positive on
this issue & said that he would be immediately talking to the IT
authorities in this matter.
D) Commencing Discussions on Charter of Demands”:- The delegation has once again raised this issue and demanded that the management should immediately invite the unions for discussions on the charter. We submitted the “Addendum to the Charter of Demand” in “Core Financial Issues on actual DA applicable as on
1st August 2012. We also reiterated that our charter should not be
linked with “Banking Sector”. ED (P) said
that the management was constantly following up this matter with the Ministry.
There were some practical problems & when the management would be in a
position to offer something it would invite the unions for discussions.
E) Class III recruitment & paucity of cashiers:- We have again raised this issue and also reiterated the need for it. The pressure of work in branches has increased manifold the major brunt of the same has to be faced by the Class I officers. ED (P) replied that some formula is being calculated to find out actual number of vacancies branch wise & some data collection was going on. He said that Class III recruitment was on the agenda of the management. We also raised the issue of shortage of cashiers & demanded recruitment of personnel exclusively as cashiers to ease the burden on the Class I Officers & to reduce the problems in the branches. ED(P) was not very positive on this issue & expressed that recruitment of Class III would be the best solution to this problem.
F) Mediclaim Subsidy for Class One officers:- We once again pointed out that while this subsidy was 3/4th for Class III, Class IV & also retired employees(including retired Class I Officers), the subsidy was 2/3rd for Class I Officers & strongly demanded that the Class I Officers should also be granted 3/4th subsidy. ED (P) was very positive about this issue & agreed to consider this demand shortly.
G) Compulsion of filing Property returns for Class One officers:- We once again raised this issue & expressed our dissatisfaction over the selective targeting of Class I Officers. We also protested the fact that such filing of property returns has been linked with the promotion & demanded that this condition should be removed forthwith. We submitted that the purported logic behind such compulsion was to have a check on corruption & also to check whether any person has assets disproportionate to his income. We submitted that the origin of corruption was in the mind & not depended on any cadre. ED (P) was not positive on this issue. He said that submission of the property returns is in the best interest of the officers and especially for those who may occupy “key posts” in the organization. The numbers of anonymous complaints against the officers in key post have increased with the advent of RTI. He also told that unless and until any vigilance complaint is raised by an authority like CBI, the packets of property returns are not opened at all. He also appealed that the officers should give correct information to safe guard one’s own interest.
H) Restriction on mail recipients: - We once again raised this issue & said that this move on the part of the management to restrict the number of mail recipients was undemocratic & gave rise to many practical problems. ED (P) assured to examine this issue at a later date.
NOINO would be following up these issues in the future. The future course of action on the above issues would be decided shortly.
Friday, December 14, 2012
We submitted our Charter of Demands to the management for wage-revision and other matters on
July 2012. One of the demands in this Charter was to
allow reimbursement of mobile expenses to the officers working on
administration side. Earlier also we put this demand separately.
We thank the management for acceding to our demand.
We are happy to announce that vide Circular No.: CO/Per/ER-A/013/2012 dated
reimbursement of mobile expenses have been allowed to officers working on
administration side. The reimbursement will come into force w.e.f. 1st January 2013. The
maximum amounts allowed are:
1. AAO/AO/ADM: Rs.400/- per month / Rs.1200/- per quarter
2. DM: Rs.500/- per month / Rs.1500/- per quarter
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Yesterday, i.e. on
11th December 2012, NOINO submitted a letter to ED(P) protesting against
non-inclusion of new batches for consideration of promotion in few cadres for
promotion round 2013. The letter is reproduced below:
The Executive Director (Personnel),
Re: Batches considered for Promotion round 2013-14
According to the information received by us regarding batches to be considered for ensuing round of Promotions, we are surprised & disappointed to note that the likely batch of AO to be considered for promotion to ADM is again 2004. Since last 2 years the 2004 batch has been considered for promotion to ADM cadre. This has resulted into lots of resentment and frustration among the AO’s of batches 2005 & 2006. Last year too, our NOINO delegation had met the then MD Shri A.K.Dasgupta on 30.12.2011 and protested this move of management of not considering the 2005 batch of AO. In spite of this, again this year the batches of 2005 & 2006 have not been considered. We lodge our strong protest in this matter.
The officers belonging to these two batches are frustrated to see that in spite of their excellent performance, they are not even considered eligible for promotion. The solution to this is to find ways & means to increase the number of vacancies & reward these officers (from 2005 & 2006 batches) which we feel should be considered.
We, therefore, request you to consider 2005 and 2006 batches of AO for promotion to the cadre of ADM for the ensuing round of promotion.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
As per information available with us, the following would be the batches to be considered for 2013 promotion round:
ZM(S)----------2009 & Earlier ZM(O)
ZM(O)----------2004 & earlier DZM/SDM
DZM/SDM----2008 & earlier DM/MM/CM
DM--------------2007 & earlier ADM/SBM
ADM/SBM----2004 & earlier AO/BM
AO/BM--------July 2007 & earlier AAO/ABM(S)
Friday, December 7, 2012
The Corporation has effected certain modifications in the scheme of Reimbursement of expenses in case of High Cost/Protracted Treatment vide circular CO/PER/ER-A/012/2012 dated 4.12. 2012. The modifications are as follows:-
A. Addition of 5 more major diseases to the list of 30 major diseases hitherto covered under the said scheme. The diseases are:-
1. Messeric Venous Thrombosis—Protein Deficiency.
2. Christmas disease.
3. Cerebral Palsy.
4. Myasthenia Gravis.
B. Removal of restriction of time limit of 180 days for re-imbursement of post-hospitalisation expenses for 4 more diseases in addition to cancer & kidney transplant (for which the restriction was not applicable already). The diseases are:-
1. Thalassemia Major.
2. Coronary Artery Disease.
3. Chronic renal failure where transplant is not done & require dialysis.
4. Brain surgery.
You may recall that NOINO has been continuously striving to bring about changes / modifications in the said scheme. We would like to reproduce the relevant part of the letter submitted by us on 27.3.2012 to ED(P), Shri B Manivannan as well as MD Shri Thomas Matthew T:-
“Removal of condition of time restriction of 180 days :- At present, there is a time restriction of 180 days for claiming post-hospitalization expenses except for Cancer & kidney transplant. We demand that this limit of 180 days should be removed for all diseases/illnesses& the re-imbursement should be made till the full amount of ex-gratia is exhausted”.
After submitting this letter, we have been continuously raising this issue in our later meetings with the management. We have followed up this issue as follows:-
1. With ED(P) Shri B Manivannan on 2.4.2012.
2. With MD Shri Sushobhan Sarker on 13.4.2012.
3. With ED(P) Shri M R Kumar on 2.7.2012 & 24.7.2012.
We are aware that some more modifications are required. NOINO will strive to bring about those modifications.